top of page

SMIRBI SUB GROUP

  • saveourbush
  • Oct 5, 2021
  • 2 min read

Here’s a summary of points discussed at the Sub Group meeting.

  1. Write to relevant state and local government authorities requesting a better plan to manage the area (whether it is the whole or just the offset area) – particularly point out aspects of the existing deferred consent (offset mechanism, vegetation management plan, etc.) that are inadequate and falling short of best practice standards

  2. Send an annotated list of issues of concern re the existing deferred consent and additional issues that haven’t been addressed, illustrate them with photos/descriptions, make requests for solutions that meet best practice in management of these issues (try to find examples of best practice as per point 3.)

  3. Use Green Point community group’s example of pushing for best practice; they achieved lots of concessions from the developer including dedication of the Green Point Reserve

  4. List of specific issues mentioned at the meeting:

    1. inadequacy of proposed fencing of soccer fields

    2. better management of vegetation corridors needed esp creekline on western side and its link into creek on southern side and eventually into Winding Creek; the sediment trap proposed for the junction of these creeks is insensitive to the health of the creek and connectivity of the vegetation (make reference to large concrete sediment traps constructed north of Myall Rd in Forest Hill estate where management of native and weed vegetation is not best practice, as well as management of nutrient enrichment and pollution of water and management of rubbish)

    3. unique orchid diversity and high Tetratheca juncea abundance that will be destroyed if housing development goes ahead and inadequacy of salvage methods – requires sensitive collection at time when species are easy to detect (when flowering), needs regular engagement of professional native vegetation managers not just establishment of Landcare group for this (and other native veg and invasive weed issues)

    4. recent (Covid-related) build-up of mountain bike tracks and related destruction of vegetation and erosion and compaction of soil because there is no management of existing users of the area; of particular concern are sensitive rainforest gullies, Powerful Owl nest and dangerous mine subsidence sites; need to establish compliance system for mountain bike riders like Glenrock SRA and exclusion system for motorbike riders

    5. management of 130 known mine subsidence ‘potholes’ requires input from habitat restoration expert in this specialised area, particularly to make site safe for recreation (walking, dog walking, birdwatching, mountain bike riding)

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Act Now-Landcom consultation OPEN-

This is your chance right now to tell Landcom and the Federal Minister for the Environment why this development should not go ahead. It...

 
 
 

Comments


About Our Group

We are a group of very concerned and angry local people. We are concerned about the impact Development has on the wildlife and wellbeing of our community. We are very concerned about the destruction of Habitat and continued loss of Biodiversity in our area. We also understand that natural areas are very important to our health and wellbeing.

We believe the development will have significant impact on the local traffic and with more planning and consideration we believe the same benefits without the impacts can be obtained on other sights in the area.

We are also concerned that the accumulative effect on our environment is enhanced as we are about to see the destruction of bush through Jesmond and into Rankin Park for what will be a highly valued road for the community, it just places more pressure on all of us to try and retain as much bush as we can to provide those refuges for our fauna and flora. 

I

 

© 2023 by Going Places. Proudly created with Wix.com

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
bottom of page